Talk:Tom Goldstein

fawning
The vast majority of the article revolves around how great he is. -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 15:32, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

The article seems to simply recite facts, and is reference-laden. Is there any fact that you are disputing?80.67.64.14 (talk) 18:33, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

I really do not see why this deserves an NPOV tag, but perhaps more citations are in order? Mikel1777 (talk) 05:32, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

The article is a public relations puff piece written by one of this legal guy's flacks or a former student. Also, he's not on either Harvard or Stanford's faculty, he occasionally visits and teaches a class, which is a big difference from being on the faculty -- that's just dishonest. The links to Harvard don't work for that reason. Webster1978 (talk) 08:00, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Indeed. This is not a typical Wikipedia biographical article. Where is the year of birth? Why no other biographical information. This looks something from a reference guide for attorneys. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.66.233.93 (talk) 20:07, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). meamemg (talk) 21:33, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Information.svg Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top.