Talk:Toro Negro State Forest

Suggestion
Hi, Unless there are plans to create new articles in the near future, I would suggest removing the links for redlinked items in the 'Flora and Fauna' box. Thanks, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 13:55, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I am creating them. I was busy creating these ones: Sloanea berteroana, Magnolia portoricensis, Ocotea moschata, and Buchenavia capitata. In some cases, like HERE, I have had to expand the articles conisderably. Since plants and fauna are not my forte, it is taking a little longer than I expected. Thank you for your suggestion, Mercy11 (talk) 14:21, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Great! Ambitious! Thank you for your contributions. Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 14:57, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Corrected photos of freshwater shrimp
Effie Greathouse (talk) 07:52, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

The photo which used to be identified as Atya lanipes is in fact a small Macrobrachium freshwater shrimp - a photo I took during my Ph.D. research, and which ended up in Wikimedia Commons without my knowledge, and incorrectly identified. I have added another photo I took that is of Atya lanipes. The Macrobrachium picture's filename still says Atya lanipes in the filename, but I have put in a request to get that fixed, and in the meantime, I corrected the label in the article.

Removal of Fauna & Flora infobox
I have restored the fauna & flora infobox which was removed HERE with the comment "we don't need two infoboxes". I fail to see why the editor feels the infobox isn't needed. I invite the editor to discuss his views here. Mercy11 (talk) 18:36, 14 February 2018 (UTC)