Talk:Tughril I

Not nephew
Under Career subtitle it says: In 1025 he, his nephew Arslan, and his brother Chaghri (Çağrı) served under the Kara-Khanids of Bukhara...

Well it seems there is a confusion of names. Arslan was not Tuğrul's nephew. He was the uncle. To be sure, there was also a nephew named Alp Arslan (the future sultan). But Alp Arslan wasn't around in 1025. (Alparslan's birth date is 1029) Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 13:06, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The name Arslan is cleared. Reason aboce. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 11:27, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Capture of Baghdad by the Fatimids in 1058
Is there any evidence to support the the implied assertion that at some time in the mid-1050s the Fatimid Caliphate captured Baghdad or any other part of Iraq?Delamer100 (talk) 16:06, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Tugril

 * "Tughril Beg" -Llc - 2,640 results
 * Beg" -Llc - 1,120 results
 * "Tuğrul Bey" (Tugrul Bey) -Llc - 572 results
 * "Tughril Bey" -Llc - 177 results
 * "Tuğrul Beg" (Tugrul Beg) -Llc - 107 results
 * "Toghril Bey" -Llc - 7 results

Takabeg (talk) 14:52, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Spelling
There is only Persian reading in the article. I do not understand why ? As is known, these are Turkic leaders. Why Persian spelling alone is placed on the head of the article? What is the reason of this ? I removed the persian spelling from the head of the article because it was irrelevant.

It is not an objective point of view to place the article only persian spelling. These people are not of Persian origin, or persian speaking. This is so misleading. There is no use for readers. It is not an impartial point of view.--78.165.85.180 (talk) 16:22, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Because it has nothing to do with ethnicity. The official and the administrative language of Seljuks was Persian. Look at the source, it is Rahat al-sudur, a book in Persian language about Seljuks, wrote by Muhammad bin Ali Rawandi, a Seljuk historian. -- Mazandar (talk) 17:01, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your participation. This is not just a reason to persuade the Persian spelling to the article. These people is Turkic leaders. Speaking the Turkic language. Putting only Persian spelling, It misleads readers. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not impartial that only Persian spelling is involved. I want to ask you a question. What is the purpose of spelling in Wikipedia?--78.165.85.180 (talk) 17:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * They were of Turkic origin, and certainly they spoke Turkic, this is true. But we can't include Turkish spelling with Latin script in the article, since modern Turkish language has nothing to do with a medieval Turkic dynasty. Look at Avicenna, we only included the Arabic spelling, this is because he wrote mostly in Arabic, even though it is known that he wrote some works in Persian and even two of his Persian works are still extant, but that's nothing compared to his Arabic works. As you see, it has nothing to do with ethnicity or spoken language, the initial spelling is for those who want to read more about the subject in primary sources, and also for showing the origin of the name. Before you ask, let me tell you Tughril is a Turkic name, but we know about this name through Persian primary sources. -- Mazandar (talk) 17:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Only the use of Persian spelling is not neutral. I dont hate persians or persian language. Culturally very developed society. The Seljuk Turks influenced by persians culturally and linguistically. But it is cultural interaction. It is not assimilation. These people have never lost their identity. Now the content is deceptive. Only the presence of Persian spelling constitutes perception. My removing reason is deceptive and not neutral.--78.165.85.180 (talk) 17:55, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * There is no obligation to spelling place in the wikipedia. I made a statement like this -Only the use of Persian spelling is not neutral. Only the presence of Persian spelling constitutes perception- Do you think that my explanation is wrong ? Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and based on neutrality policy in the first place. There is no obligation to add an spelling. There's no point in pushing yourself in this. I say it is misleading and not impartial. There are only arabic writing in your example. This indicates that the article is an error. The example does not change the fact that it's a mistake. It's better not to ever be if content is deceptive,misleading and not neutral.--78.165.85.180 (talk) 20:35, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppet
It would appear that "IP 78.165.85.180" is yet another sock IP of CU blocked sockmaster User:EMr KnG. His last confirmed IP and account were "78.165.72.147" and "AlpAy", blocked and confirmed very recently, who had the exact same geo-location, exact same profiency in English, exact same concerns, and, above all, completely similar target articles as this new IP of the very same range. Refer also to the relevant ANI discussion where the circus show was revealed. , considering you dealt with this duck last time, would you be willing to take the courtesy this time as well? - LouisAragon (talk) 00:17, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I am not User:EMr KnG. Do you really think I'm the same user? This LouisAragon user is using wikipedia to make totally nationalist propaganda. If there is no reply the users are threatened and accused of being puppet.--78.165.84.131 (talk) 10:41, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Lol. --HistoryofIran (talk) 13:18, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

language
বাংলায় অনুবাদ করা হোক। RomanRace (talk) 10:17, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

বাংলা অনুবাদ। RomanRace (talk) 10:17, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

This page is in great demand in bangla, so this page is translated into Bengali. RomanRace (talk) 03:20, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

translate
plz, this page translate in to bangla — Preceding unsigned comment added by RomanRace (talk • contribs) 12:41, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

translate please bangali language. TaxuxTo (talk) 10:06, 15 January 2018 (UTC)