Talk:Tulsa Outrage

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedy deleted as lacking sufficient context to identify its subject, because... (your reason here) --Wordgrrl (talk) 23:29, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

the article clearly states the time and place in which this particular act of vigilantism occurred. The Tulsa Outrage is also an occurrence of note, as it is referenced on many other pages, most notably, perhaps, on the "tar and feather" page, in which it is listed as one of the few modern examples of the use of that method of torture.

Breach of law behind the case
"... were convicted by Judge T.D. Evans of the crime of not owning a war bond. " By virtue of which law could people be convicted of such a crime ?

A pacifist might be taxed by the warring state. But buying war bonds isn't compulsory as far as I know in a society like USA where freedom is praised. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.176.120.156 (talk) 18:04, 25 March 2014 (UTC)