Talk:Tzuf Dvash Synagogue

Location
Chesdovi, the first line of the article speaks about the location of it today, "Land of Israel" is not the most commonly used name today for where places in East Jerusalem are located. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 07:33, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Chesdovi, concerning your edit1:, why did you ad that its located in the "Land of Israel" ? This is not an official name for where its located. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 16:58, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Well make up your mind. I have reworded so it does not imply the "current" location. Now you want an "offical" name instead? Chesdovi (talk) 17:38, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * If you want to name the name of the entity when its was built, it wouldn't be "Land of Israel", as that was not the locations official name. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 21:14, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * What was the offical name? Chesdovi (talk) 23:42, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * You was the one who added it, provide a source saying that the official name for that region during the Ottoman Empire was "Land of Israel. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 15:54, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Hang on, you are the one saying its not, so you should know? Chesdovi (talk) 16:33, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I find the name extremely unlikely for a part within the Ottoman Empire. You are the one who should bring the source supporting the claim since you are the one who added it.--Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 17:25, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * How can we leave a city withour a region? I have no time now, but we could use "Zion" as that is what the ottomans called it when referring to the Jewish leader at the time, i.e. "First to Zion". Chesdovi (talk) 18:15, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Temple Mount does it without mentioning that its by a large majority of the IC regarded as located in the Palestinian territories. Do you have a source that says that the official name for the district Jerusalem was located in was "Zion" ? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 18:27, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

I dont think the IC think EJ is actually a part of the PT. They just use the term to designate the area. Let's say Jordan occupied Mt Scopus in 1967. That area may very well be called occupied Israeli territroy, but it is still not recognised as legally belonging to Israel. EJ is not recognised as being part of the PT. How could it. The whole of the city's stauts is yet to be decided. Chesdovi (talk) 23:20, 12 May 2011 (UTC)