Talk:UEFA coefficient

Highlighting top 2 teams in men's coefficient table
Currently, the men's club coefficient table shows the highest coefficient for each season in bold. Would it be worth also highlighting the number 2 coefficient for each season, since that association will earn an extra berth in the Champions League? Perhaps highlighting #2 using something other than bold (maybe bold italics). I realize one can just sort the table and see who the top 2 are. But then again, the same can be done to identify the team with the highest coefficient and yet we still have that number in bold. Also, if there's a tie for #2, sorting wouldn't necessarily take tie-breakers into account. I think highlighting #2 in some way would make this information easier to find. Bmf 051 (talk) 21:11, 14 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Isn't that the association coefficient that gives those 2 spots, not the club coefficient? Either way, each league only gets 4 Champions League spots (+ potentially the previous seasons Championship and Europa League winners). I don't see that it's worth trying to indicate which stage teams qualify to; as there's many more beyond this. Also I think note 'b' already covers this. Nfitz (talk) 18:38, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Er no, from next season, two leagues will get an extra spot for up to five in total. Tvx1 09:42, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

4-year Club coefficient
I don't know why we (and UEFA) still report the 5-year Club coefficient when (as far as I know) it has no bearing on anything. Yet the 4-year Club coefficient is now used for determining the qualification to the Club World Cup - and it's not documented anywhere in Wikipedia (I can't even find a good external source for it - though I haven't been too thorough on that). Nfitz (talk) 18:40, 2 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The article explains carefully what it’s used for! Tvx1 00:07, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks, @Tvx1 I completely forgot about the seeding. Massive brain fart there! But the article says it IS being used for the Club World Cup - and I'm scratching my head for what - I thought they were only using a 4-year coefficient, not a 5-year one. Nfitz (talk) 00:13, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Article is difficult to navigate on mobile
Is the a way to make this article collapsible? JBrown95 (talk) 16:51, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 * You should be specific. What does "make this article collapsible" mean? How are you viewing it? What problem are you trying to solve? When I view it on desktop, the menu is always available on the left, and it seems relatively easy to navigate. Greenman (talk) 19:27, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Ah, so the problem might just be on mobile/tablet.
 * I'm not sure how to best explain it. So bear with me.
 * So when you go on to other articles you can tap on the headings to reveal that section of the article and then you can tap it again to hide it.
 * On this article the whole page is just one long scroll, with no ability to show/hide different sections.
 * Making navigation not great JBrown95 (talk) 11:22, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I did notice how difficult it is to read on mobile the other day. But I don't use mobile enough to know why. Chrome on Android - same result in Incognito mode.Nfitz (talk) 11:27, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * seems to be specific to this article. A different article, say FIFA Men's World Ranking seems to be able to do the collapsing on mobile Assassin (talk) 11:35, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Another article not working is 2023 Major League Soccer season. I wonder if a template or map is broken. Nfitz (talk) 18:39, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

suggestion about a new map
it would be better if someone can make a new map which contains countries that at least one team reaches to group stage of any uefa club competion. (includes champions league, europa league and conference) 176.40.246.182 (talk) 21:11, 18 April 2024 (UTC)