Talk:UHF Follow-On satellite

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on UFO (satellite). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070228081235/http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/space/bss/factsheets/601/uhf_followon/uhf_followon.html to http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/space/bss/factsheets/601/uhf_followon/uhf_followon.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:14, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Requested move 22 April 2021

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Moved to UHF follow-on satellite  (t &#183; c)  buidhe  00:28, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Ultra High Frequency Follow-On → UHF follow-on system – This descriptive title seems more appropriate than the several over-capitalized proper-name-like titles that have been tried here. The current title seems particularly uncommon in sources, and with the more common UHF, caps do not dominate enough wrt the threshold of MOS:CAPS. Dicklyon (talk) 04:13, 22 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Or satellite – UHF follow-on satellite is most common in sources. Dicklyon (talk) 04:16, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Support move to UHF follow-on satellite. Used in sources and far more recognisable. Ticks all the boxes. Andrewa (talk) 16:50, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose Ultra High Frequency Follow-On is the actual name of the satellite system, like Advanced Extremely High Frequency (the U.S. sucks at naming satellite systems. Most reputable sources I’ve seen from a quick google search seem to use that verbiage. (N-gram results are also from so long ago I’m not sure how reliable they would be for this to establish COMMONNAME). Garuda28 (talk) 04:23, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: By the actual name I guess you mean the one used in primary sources. We do consider these, but they do not take precedence over others to say the least. The policy is that secondary sources take precedence. Andrewa (talk) 16:47, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Support UHF follow-on satellite. Rreagan007 (talk) 16:42, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Although he didn't close this discussion, already implemented the move according to consensus. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  00:29, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for closing it. I completely forgot to add closure templates as I had a phone call while performing the moves. Thanks again! – DarkGlow • 08:32, 26 May 2021 (UTC)