Talk:Universal Music Distribution

This article seems a bit extraneous. I say that a section for it should simply be noted on the Universal Music Group article. —The Real One Returns 18:44, 22 September 2009 (UTC)


 * I think there's enough reason for the UMD article to remain outside the UMG article. The business operates pretty much autonomously of the main UMG company; there's also scope for the article to be expanded to discuss its corporate history and subsequent amalgamations or mergers. I vote to keep as is. Christopher (talk) 18:20, 2 October 2009 (UTC)