Talk:Unreal (TV series)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Field producer[edit]

IP 68.110.212.125 continues to add "field producer" to describe producers on the show-within-the-show, without explanation. To my knowledge, the series has not used this term in its one broadcast episode. Further, I don't think this description applies to the show as presented. I'd like a discussion here before this IP proceeds further.— TAnthonyTalk 04:40, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The other thing: "Chet Wilton, the eccentric drug-addicted creator of Everlasting who is having an affair with Quinn." If neither of them has been established as being married or in other relationships, then it is not an "affair".— TAnthonyTalk 14:04, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Lifetime has already released the next 3 episodes online and we see Chet's wife in episode 2.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.71.141.20 (talk)
OK good on that one, thanks. Editors should learn to explain themselves via edit summary when reverting. — TAnthonyTalk 18:09, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Field producer is a common category of producing in TV and news production. Just because you don't understand it doesn't mean it's not true. It's what the position is called in many industry news references about the show.
I completely 100% disagree. I think an affair if there is supposed to be a committed relationship is an affair. BrillLyle (talk) 06:15, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I never said I didn't "understand", especially considering I've BEEN a field producer for television, but neither the show itself or any of the sources I've seen for the show have routinely used the term for the characters, especially as of Episode 1, which is when this issue came up. Also, Episode 1 hadn't introduced either Chet or Quinn as being in other relationships so at that point the characters were just dating. I was corrected by the IP who pointed out that Ep 2 established that Chet was married.— TAnthonyTalk 15:23, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Title format[edit]

Just to head off any further reverts, Trivialist's article move from UnREAL to Unreal (TV series), as well as the use of Unreal rather than UnREAL within the article, is proper per the MOS. Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trademarks explains it pretty well, and I would direct editors to Time (magazine) as a notable example of this guideline in use.— TAnthonyTalk 14:46, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]