Talk:Upper Canada College Board of Stewards

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Ontario / Toronto Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as Low-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Upper Canada College houses#Wedd's|Wedd's House]] The anchor (#Wedd's) has been deleted by other users before.
[[Upper Canada College houses#Howard's|Howard's House]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Untitled[edit]

The information on this article should be cut down to what is most important and merged into Upper Canada College. I'll take my best guess on what's important if nobody else wants to try. johnpseudo 21:29, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure it should be added to the main UCC article. While this one could certainly do with some expanding, the main one is already far too long. --gbambino 17:49, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lists of members[edit]

I'm beginning to think the lists of Board members over the past four years should be removed: 1) they attract vandalism from anon IP users, 2) they're unverified and unencyclopaedic, and 3) the people included therein (no offence intended) just aren't notable. Is there any disagreement with this reasoning? --G2bambino 15:34, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, well a week later an no comments. I'm going to take the lists out. --G2bambino 05:58, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]