Talk:Use Your Illusion I

<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>

 * All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 20:52, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

GN'R SUCKS
"The Use Your Illusion albums were originally titled "G N' R Sucks" (creating a pattern along with G N' R Lies) but the name was changed when it was decided that there would be two albums released simultaneously, rather than one double-album. This original title was the inspiration for the fansite gnrsucks.com"

was the internet around in 1991, and if it was, was it used enough for people to be aware of a "gnrsucks.com"

Slash&#39;s snakepit 03:40, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

The fansite wasn't created in 1991 but that doesn't mean the site wasn't inspired by the original title. You can be inspired millions of years after something was created. So I don't really see your point. L CuRtiS 03:51, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Personnel Section
The article does not mention clearly in this section that Izzy Stradlin does lead volcals on tracks 2, 6 and 9. I think this should really be changed. If there is any obljection please answer. Otherwise I'll make this minor change. Tell me if I've missed where it is written by mistake. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FateForger (talk • contribs) 23:22, 3 January 2010 (UTC) Why is there any discussion about the personnel section, since the liner notes list the contributions of each band member for each individual song — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.6.108.86 (talk) 22:54, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

St Louis
I think that it should be added that in the liner notes of both albums that "fuck you St Louis" appears. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.10.194.238 (talk) 14:48, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

"Song information" section needs to go
It seems that this section exists only because someone decided that every song on the album which doesn't meet the criteria for its own standalone article nonetheless needs to be discussed in some detail. The problem is, most of the information is unsourced or ridiculous. For example, there isn't much more than "This is the second track on the album" for most of the songs. Any useful information from this section should be merged into the "Overview" section where it belongs. ChakaKongtalk 12:05, 12 June 2013 (UTC)