Talk:Víctor Pradera Larumbe

Manual of style and Basque ethnicity reverts

 * Hi, I open this section after the reverts on the article. The Manual of Style is clear as to capitalization and the location of images on the overall layout, so it does not seem very reasonable to make an automatic revert. I have no problem with this or other articles overall related to this subject, but things can be made to improve them, the WP and this article, this is a collaborative resource. As regards ethnicity, he is obviously a Basque, check the definition of ethnicity, and Pradera's career struggling always with his identity, pretty widespread a phenomenon in the Basque history of the 19th and 20th century. {Dd1495 will know better than me for sure, but I do think he defined himself as a Basque (nobody called into question at that time the Basqueness of Navarre), he had a Basque background, family line, entourage, sets himself in the Basque tradition, and did speak Basque.
 * Not every information without a reference is automatically liable to deletion, where would WP be then? Iñaki LL (talk) 21:29, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

"but I do think he defined himself as a Basque" I beg you pardon? Bring the sources, please (WP:VER, WP:PROVEIT: The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing a citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution). You are making up an argument out of WP:OR.--Asqueladd (talk) 11:26, 20 August 2015 (UTC) PS:
 * Do you understand what dispute resolution is? Your attitude above is not, and I have just come from another discussion with identical features (IPs and vandal eventually blocked), so pretty tired with this demanding tone. You have not made any point on the subject yet, which I would like to know about. (I made my point above) Iñaki LL (talk) 12:21, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Dd1495, this is a petty discussion. There is nothing arbitrary in the manual of style (WP:IMGLOC), I-don't-like-it is arbitrary. In fact, you will never find in an encyclopedia that layout you keep adding on the article. Thanks for contributing to smooth editing. Iñaki LL (talk) 15:43, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

--

according to the wiki theoretical layout guidelines and best practice, moving the image to correct location.

theoretical guidelines:

 * spreading images evenly and relevantly (WP:LAYIM): “images should ideally be spread evenly within the article, and relevant to the sections they are located in”
 * alternating left and right ((WP:STACKING): “perhaps the easiest way to handle multiple floating pictures is to alternate them left then right (or right then left); this way they do not come into contact with one another, and so cannot stack up in an unattractive way”
 * avoiding stack-ups (WP:STACKING): “one of the problems many users of floating pictures hit is that multiple pictures sometimes stack up vertically, particularly with large screens and wide images” . For example, in many browsers the two pictures at the right of this text stack up awkwardly”

best practice: see featured articles (“considered to be the best articles Wikipedia has to offer”), below those appearing in July and August 2015 only:

 * Entoloma sinuatum (featured article on August 10, 2015)
 * Telopea oreades (featured article on July 20, 2015)
 * Tropical Storm Brenda (1960) (featured article on July 15, 2015)
 * Castell Coch (featured article on August 13, 2015)
 * Pluto (featured article on July 14, 2015)
 * SMS Königsberg (1905) (featured article on July 11, 2015)
 * Irataba (featured article on August 3, 2015)
 * Operation Camargue (featured article on July 28, 2015)
 * Elliott Fitch Shepard (featured article on July 25, 2015)
 * M-28 Business (Ishpeming–Negaunee, Michigan) (featured article on July 24, 2015)
 * Chelsea Bridge (featured article on July 10, 2015)

--Dd1495 (talk) 20:50, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Ok, listen, what you claim above are not general rules but solutions to specific problems, WP:IMGLOC applies to general situations, but I am not going to waste more time with your battleground mentality to be honest, have it your own way. What I can attest is to your total inability to engage in consensus building, a mainstay of the wikipedia. Bye. Iñaki LL (talk) 22:21, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Missing complete reference to "Orella Martínez 2013"
The article includes two reference to a work identified as "Orella Martínez 2013", however it lacks a complete reference to such a work. I have not been able to determine whether it was a typo (e.g. for "2012") or to another work by the same author, or a confusion with another author (there are several works published by this author or the same year mentionned). CaféBuzz (talk) 10:27, 10 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Same thing with "Rodríguez Jiménez, 2002". CaféBuzz (talk) 16:00, 10 February 2024 (UTC)