Talk:Valencianism

Corruption scandals
Should this article explain the blaverist's representatives are involved in corruption scandals? — Jɑuмe (dis-me) 21:56, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Illegal financing
In early 2009 a scandal involving several senior members of the Popular Party came to the public's attention. The Gürtel case resulted in the resignation of the party's treasurer Luis Bárcenas in 2009. The case against him was dropped in July 2011 but reopened the following year.

The leader of the party in the Valencia Country, Francisco Camps, stepped down in July 2011 because of a pending trial. He was accused of having received gifts in exchange for public contracts, but was found to be not guilty.

Bárcenas affair
In January 2013, the judges investigation discovered an account in Switzerland controlled by Luis Bárcenas with 22 million euros and another 4.5 million in the United States. Allegations appeared in the media regarding the existence of supposed illegal funds of the PP, used for the undercover monthly payments to VIPs in the party from 1989 to 2009, including the current and former government presidents, Mariano Rajoy and José María Aznar. The existence of such illicit funding has been denied by the PP.

Should we mention the following topics?

 * Fabra case (or Naranjax), Gürtel, Brugal, CAM, Bárcenas, Blasco, Emarsa, Nóos, Naseiro...?
 * Aeroport de Castelló, Terra Mítica (Societat Projectes Temàtics de la Comunitat Valenciana), Ciutat de les Arts i les Ciències, Ciutat de la Llum, "Orange Market", the Accident de Metro de València, the Visita del Papa Benet XVI, the Tancament de Radiotelevisió Valenciana, etc.


 * See es:Anexo:Casos judiciales relacionados con corrupción política en España

Corruption
Which relation has the corruption of conservative-unionist political parties with the history of valencianism? I believe that it would hardly be compatible with our WP:Neutrality policy.--Coentor (talk) 22:32, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Merge or deletion or redirection or disambiguation
Right now, this article only has content copyied from early versions of Valencian nationalism article. This contect was discarded in discussion because it was considered outdated and not neutral. If the content wasn't good enough for that article, then it should not be good for this one. Other option could be creating a disambiguation page like was made in Spanish Wikipedia, if is considered that "Valencianism" cannot be the name for the main entry of "Valencian Nationalism".--Coentor (talk) 17:33, 2 March 2016 (UTC)