Talk:Victoria Longley

Requested move 9 August 2017

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: moved - pages swapped with templates put on each article as there were two disambiguation pages.  Dr Strauss   talk   13:38, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Victoria Longley (Australian actress) → Victoria Longley – Sole subject of Wikipedia biographical article who uses this exact name. The only other entry at the Victoria Longley disambiguation page is English actress Vicky Longley whose own professional website, http://www.vickylongley.co.uk, uses the form "Vicky", not "Victoria". A hatnote atop the article for the Australian actress, who was not known as "Vicky", should resolve any confusion. &mdash;Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 05:33, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Support WP:PRIMARYORONLYTOPIC. --В²C ☎ 22:40, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note this is a spurious guideline, see Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:PRIMARYORONLYTOPIC In ictu oculi (talk) 08:38, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Spurious guideline? Huh? It's not a guideline. It's a definition. The point is:  she's either the primary or only topic for this name and which it is is immaterial; either way the disambiguation is unnecessary.  Citing the definition saves saying all that. --В²C ☎ 19:47, 10 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Support having said that, in this case the real guideline WP:PRIMARYTOPIC is sufficient, the proposal passes on both criteria. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:38, 10 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.