Talk:Video game/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Quick-failed due to the fact that there are large portions as well as whole (sub)sections of completely unsourced information as well as many valid fact tags remaining. It clearly does not meet criterion 3 requiring verifiability. Prose and layout are also still very inconsistent. This article still has quite a few improvements to make before considering for GA. You may re-nominate for GA when these issues are resolved. Sorry, MuZemike 22:16, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Ooops. I wonder how I missed some of that stuff, I looked over the article many times. Sorry if this was a waste of time. Abce2 |  Aww nuts!  Wribbit!(Sign here)  22:31, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * No worries. Add sources, improve some of the writing, get it peer reviewed, and it'll be up there. MuZemike 18:14, 2 September 2009 (UTC)