Talk:Visual art of Singapore/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: AirshipJungleman29 (talk · contribs) 11:26, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

I am quick-failing this review due to substantial sourcing and copyright issues. Not only are there unsourced passages, but a significant amount of content is plagiarised or closely paraphrased (WP:CLOP).

For example: Article: "In this context, the 19th-century European artist was seen as an individual who possessed the technical skills to accurately depict what was seen, with draughtsmanship allowing one to record information about coastlines and harbours prior to the advent of photography." Source: "One aspect of the artist in the 19th-century European context was a personal who possessed skills to depict accurately what was seen...British naval officers were required to learn draughtsmanship in order to record accurate information about coastlines and harbours. Before the advent of photography..."

Or Article: "British officers who worked as surveyors, architects, and engineers in colonial Singapore were some of the early artists to create images of Singapore, such as Charles Andrew Dyce and John Turnbull Thomson." Source: "British officers who worked as surveyors, architects, and engineers in colonial Singapore were some of the earliest artists to capture impressions of Singapore, among them, Charles Andrew Dyce and John Turnbull Thomson."

I will restore this article to pre-copyright violation text, and request that the revisions be removed per WP:REVDEL. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:26, 11 April 2023 (UTC)