Talk:WHIH Newsfront

Image
I personally felt that the red image used for the Civil War videos would have been a better choice. What was your reasoning for choosing the blue one? Because it was the first one? - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:28, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The blue one was for the series as introduced, the red one was for the "Special Report" on the Avengers. That was my thought process really. - adamstom97 (talk) 16:31, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * True. I just felt the red one was more "neutral" as it were, since it didn't list Everhart, given she was joined by Adams for the Civil War videos. Not a big deal, just felt that was a better choice. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:07, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I understand that thinking, but I'd stick with the blue one still. Perhaps add the red one as well, in the production section, but not instead of. - adamstom97 (talk) 19:50, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't think we have enough reason to per the non-free guidelines to add it elsewhere in the article. It would just be ornamental, and not provide visual aid to some type of commentary. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 05:52, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Google is not a video production company
Google is not a production company so should not be listed as one on this page.

There is no mention of any substantive involvement from them in referenced article from Marvel's website, in fact the only reference in the article body is a partnership with Google+ to host the videos. Calling Google the production company way overstates what involvement they had, if any, in the production of these marketing videos by Marvel Studios.

OQZYwD0R (talk) 00:55, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The source in question states: "we partnered with Google for a series of in-world videos from the Marvel Cinematic Universe", along with the title of the article being "Marvel & Google Take You Deeper Into the World of 'Ant-Man'". By just saying "we partnered with Google", it is not very clear what that partnership is, be it just as a place to host the videos, or actually a production partner. The prose in the lead and article are both fine, but maybe it should be removed from the infobox, since you and I both don't know the extent of the "partnership", which would be WP:OR on all our parts. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:57, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Alright then. - adamstom97 (talk) 21:21, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Canon or not canon
Does the fact that the page keeps on saying it's a "faux" news show, mean that it is not canon to the MCU? List of Marvel Cinematic Universe tie-in comics brings up the subject on whether or not the comics are canon, so it's not just a fan question. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible (talk) 01:36, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * By faux we mean it is pretending to be a news show. The WHIH news network doesn't actually exist. - adamstom97 (talk) 06:25, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * It know it doesn't exist, obviously, but I don't know why repeated emphasis has to be put on it when it's already obvious it's not real to begin with. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible (talk) 13:13, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Is it though? The way they were released, one could believe it is in fact a real news program. It does not hurt to have the clarification. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:25, 2 May 2017 (UTC)