Talk:Wajid Ali Shah

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
 * This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
 * There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
 * It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
 * In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:08, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Wajid Ali Shah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150216104509/http://kolkataonwheels.com/article-details/nabab-wajid-ali-shah.html to http://www.kolkataonwheels.com/article-details/nabab-wajid-ali-shah.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090915185442/http://lucknow.nic.in/Wazir.htm to http://lucknow.nic.in/Wazir.htm
 * Added tag to http://www.indiancoins.8m.com/awadh/AwadhHist.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:29, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Information placement
while it's clear that this article needs work, the inclusion of the (partially unsourced) information about his wives in the intro header rather than in the biography section seems odd. 1. the unsourced statement about nikahi wives seems to have been unsourced for long enough to justify it's removal and 2. shouldn't statements about this be under a subsequent section? I was under the impression that the header was supposed to be a concise summation of the article's content. Evansknight (talk) 14:56, 25 April 2023 (UTC)