Talk:War in Darfur/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 20:10, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: fixed five and tagged five. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:19, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

'::I am going to delist this as the article does not currently meet the good article criteria. When it has been sorted out, please renominate at WP:GAN. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:35, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * The prose could do with a thorough copy-edit, for grammar, clarity and readability.
 * a number of stray sentences which should be consolidated into paragraphs.
 * the lead does not fully summarise the article.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * five dead links
 * inconsistently formatted in-line citations
 * Those sources which are accessible appear to be reliable.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * A better explanation of the causes of the conflict is needed, also a more thorough analysis of Sudan's politics and the deacdes long cicil ear in the South which has some connection to this.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * This is an emotive topic and I believe that many additions to this article have introduced a non-neutral point of view.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Appear to have been a large number of fairly recent POV additions.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * Fair enough. The article may also contain copyvios added by - please see Contributor copyright investigations/De Administrando Imperio Nick-D (talk) 22:51, 10 October 2010 (UTC)