Talk:Wendy Lovell

Promotional editing
For the benefit of Polliewatch and the IP account that has made the same changes, please note that edits to this page need to be referenced and use neutral language. Speaking of the ‘highly successful’ whatever and the subject being the ‘driver of significant reform’ is subjective language unless it can be qualified with an appropriate reference by a credible news source.

Claiming that the statements are ‘factual’ does not make them so, doubly so when the language is so clearly promotional.

I’m not going to revert your latest edit again tonight, as promotional as it is, but suggest reviewing again or to be prepared for edits to be reverted by neutral editors like me and others. You simply can’t do 1500 word edits with no or barely connected references to one small aspect of claim.

Happy to discuss or will come back to this in a day or two Ponyshine (talk) 09:06, 5 June 2022 (UTC)