Talk:White Mountain art/GAR

GA Re-Review and In-line citations

Members of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles are in the process of doing a re-review of current Good Article listings to ensure compliance with the standards of the Good Article Criteria. (Discussion of the changes and re-review can be found here). A significant change to the GA criteria is the mandatory use of some sort of in-line citation (In accordance to WP:CITE) to be used in order for an article to pass the verification and reference criteria. Currently this article does not include in-line citations. It is recommended that the article's editors take a look at the inclusion of in-line citations as well as how the article stacks up against the rest of the Good Article criteria. GA reviewers will give you at least a week's time from the date of this notice to work on the in-line citations before doing a full re-review and deciding if the article still merits being considered a Good Article or would need to be de-listed. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact us on the Good Article project talk page or you may contact me personally. On behalf of the Good Articles Project, I want to thank you for all the time and effort that you have put into working on this article and improving the overall quality of the Wikipedia project. -- The Bethling^(Talk) 22:58, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

GA status

I have removed the good article tag from this article. It was added by savidan^{(talk) (e@)} on February 21, but I cannot find any evidence that the 'GAnominee' tag was ever added to this article, nor was it ever listed on the Good article candidates page, nor was it added to the Good article listing after it the GA tag was added. If you would like to nominate this article for GA status, please review the good article criteria and nominate it at WP:GAC. Dr. Cash 22:03, 25 March 2007 (UTC)