Talk:William Burgess Pryer

Textbook writing style
If this wasn't on Wikipedia, you'd think that this was taken out of some Malaysian secondary-school textbook. The writing is terribly biased (come on! The introductory paragraph describes his character! At least set that within the framework of 'Pryer is often regarded as having been' or something, not 'he is described as'. The latter is absolute, and the closest you could get to 'he was'.) and the use of 'we' is regulatorily ambiguous at best. Someone needs to fix this. Uaiazr Jxhiosh (talk) 04:57, 20 January 2021 (UTC)