Talk:William Charles Wells

Two essays
Re: recent edits. I moved the bit about two essays because it doesn't make grammatical sense and I couldn't work out what was being said. If the text is to be reverted, could it also be made to make sense? It just says "Two essays and ", with no text to clarify. And then in the next paragraph it starts "In this paper ...", but which paper? Before the "Two essays" bit there is mention of a paper - is it this one? And if not, it needs to be made clear what it's referring to. Cheers, --Plumbago 13:09, 12 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Cheers Duncharris - much better! Thanks, --Plumbago 15:27, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

Ophthalmology
There's an opportunity here for someone to do a section on Wells' research into ophthalmology. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:08, 17 January 2008 (UTC)


 * A year later, and there's still a need for an appreciation of his medical and ophthalmological work. Macdonald-ross (talk) 18:00, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Darwin's view
I have given a bit more prominence to Darwin's view of him; obviously that's important. Macdonald-ross (talk) 17:59, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Skeptical Science
The History of Climate Science - William Charles Wells Posted on 18 March 2012 by Doc Snow – interesting coverage of Wells, but questionable as a source. . . dave souza, talk 18:12, 17 January 2016 (UTC)