Talk:Wolfram von Richthofen

Section on Guernica
Perhaps this is just me but it seems a little...partisan, I suppose? Does it in its current state fit within Wikipedia's guidelines or is something amiss? Not accusing anyone, but it seems especially crafted to make Guernica seem like "no big deal" by only citing one, very conservative, figure of the casualties and over-all it strikes me as having a specific prerogative on the part of the author.

A date

 * Appears in the Genealogisches Handbuch des Adels, Band XIX (1996), s. 230. WIth these dates. - Nunh-huh 21:10, 24 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Changes recently
The lead does not repeat itself. The reputation part has not been completed yet. Dapi89 (talk)•

excel
"he did not excel at foreign languages (in which he scored average to poor results)"

Is it expected that he should excel? If not, "he scored average to poor results in foreign languages" is enough, isn't it? 2001:1BA8:143A:9D00:50E3:C413:6766:D05 (talk) 17:19, 10 June 2024 (UTC)