Talk:Women's Charter

Requested move 07 November 2015

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Move. Rough consensus that this is the primary topic. Cúchullain t/ c 14:51, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Women's Charter (Singapore) → Women's Charter – There's no reason for the "(Singapore)" part because there's nothing else to disambiguate it against. This is a move over a redirect. – The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:36, 7 November 2015 (UTC) Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 02:25, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
 * This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:37, 7 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep the disambig. There are many variously-named women's rights groups across the world. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:37, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Oppose Women's Charter should be a dab page with Women's Charter (South Africa) redirecting to The Federation of South African Women (FEDSAW) and The Women's Charter by Lady McLaren In ictu oculi (talk) 05:39, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * , In ictu oculi: The issue is that right now it's a redirect, not a disambig. If it actually were a disambig, I would absolutely not have called for the move. Since neither of the other uses have articles, I think that the best course of action is to execute the requested move, and use Template:for2 to point to the other two uses. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:12, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT covers this, but it could be a dab page. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:46, 15 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Sorry :: by "disambig" I meant the appendage "(Singapore)". Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:34, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Support. Clear primary topic for mine. Vast majority of search results for "Women's Charter" in both Google and Wikipedia relate to this topic. Additionally, no other topics called "Women's Charter" appear to meet our notability guidelines, which is a good indicator for how significant (or insignificant) they are. Jenks24 (talk) 12:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.