Talk:Wonder Woman/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Redtigerxyz (talk · contribs) 18:10, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Initial comments:
 * Neutrality issues: The lead sentence is her glorification by her creator. A rather WP:PEACOCK statement. A more neutral sentence is needed. "Arguably the most popular and iconic female superhero in comics", "the most powerful female DC Comics superhero" unreferenced POV.
 * "was created by William Moulton Marston" mentioned twice in lead.
 * Fix tags in the article. -- Redtigerxyz  Talk 18:21, 4 November 2012 (UTC)


 * I have fixed them. Thank you for pointing out.--WonderBoy1998 (talk) 15:00, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

-- Redtigerxyz Talk 15:29, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Ref 2 is not reliable. Replace it with reliable source
 * The first whole para is WP:original research, based on a WP:PRIMARY ref (comics).


 * COuld you please point out as to which section does the 'first para' belong or is it the intro's first para. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 15:02, 6 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Sorry. Personality. Had already tagged in article. Also added tags in Costume. The assertions are based on the wiki-authors' interpretation of the comics. Full review on weekend.-- Redtigerxyz  Talk 16:29, 6 November 2012 (UTC)


 * You mean to say tht I had already cited the personality section correctly or do i need to specify more? I see some original research indicators there still. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 16:49, 6 November 2012 (UTC)


 * The references (being primary sources i.e. sources) do not work here. You need to replace them with WP:SECONARY sources. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 17:28, 6 November 2012 (UTC)


 * I have done it now. But I've used the same reference (A Comicbookresources one) everywhere expect for the New 52 part as basically I've used that resource as the reference for the mostly the whole section (new 52 part has a different citation, and image is also there) — Preceding unsigned comment added by WonderBoy1998 (talk • contribs) 15:01, 7 November 2012 (UTC)


 * I will address these issues ASAP and renominate it. Hopefully it passes next time.--WonderBoy1998 (talk) 11:52, 11 November 2012 (UTC)