Talk:Wopkaimin people

PRIMARYTOPIC
Re the claim in reverting Wopkaimin people to Wopkaimin as a dab page, claiming the people are not the primary topic, as usual with such claims without any evidence, there were ZERO views of the language article this month and 142 for the people article. There were 603 views for the people article in the last 90 days, vs another ZERO for the language article. Apparently "primary topic" is construed to means its "opposite", another term used by the same revisionist to mean the opposite of what it does..... the "language as a primary topic" claim made over and over by the editor in question was heard time and again in RM after RM that closed/moved with consensus saying "the people are the primary topic". Not that what anyone else says, or what reality is, matter when obstinacy and misrepresentation will suffice. Proof of primary topic has never been provided in dozens ("hundreds" and even "five thousand") cases, except by other editors (including myself) who have used view stats, google searches and more to prove "the people are the primary topic". The game of charades is getting old; this false claim is one of hundreds that will be being sent to ARBCOM about this editor's ongoing activities to defend his preferences over policy.Skookum1 (talk) 06:12, 24 May 2014 (UTC)