Talk:World Chess Championship 1948

Controversy section
I read through the 3 references cited in the "Controversy" section, and the author did not express the opinion that the "Controversy" section claimed he did. I think the sentence describing the "author's opinion" (which is not the author's opinion) should be deleted. Thoughts? Charlesreid1 (talk) 17:50, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * How would you describe Kingston's opinion on the question? I did not write or edit that section, but I thought it was a fair summary of Kingston's writing on the issue.  Perhaps I did not read it carefully enough. Quale (talk) 19:24, 14 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I wrote the section. Following Charlesreid1's comment I've just re-read the last of Kingston's 3 articles, and I still think the "Controversy" section summarises Kingston's conclusions accurately. Philcha (talk) 11:19, 21 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I think what you wrote is good. Unless we get a more specific complaint, it can be kept as is. Quale (talk) 16:11, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on World Chess Championship 1948. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080905102233/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/kb1.txt to http://www.chesscafe.com/text/kb1.txt

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 03:09, 2 July 2016 (UTC)