Talk:Yehud-Monosson

Fair use rationale for Image:Yehud-MonossonEmblem.jpg
Image:Yehud-MonossonEmblem.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:06, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Merge
I believe that the merger of Modi'in and Maccabim-Re'ut into Modi'in-Maccabim-Re'ut worked well and it is pointless to have an article to all three localities involved here (Yehud, Neve Monosson, Yehud-Monosson), since they are now one and the same. Many cities in Israel incorporated villages as they expanded, and some even comprise villages (e.g. Hod HaSharon, which was a result of the merger of four villages). Currently we have articles on all the merged cities with their "components" redirecting to the main article, with few exceptions. —Ynhockey (Talk) 11:07, 22 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Agreed, assuming the combined article does justice to the earlier distinct fragments. Zerotalk 03:50, 23 June 2010 (UTC)