Talk:Young Engineers' Satellite 2

NPOV
This article is not objective. It talks up the project as a success without keeping a neutral point of view. 188.192.112.162 (talk) 01:11, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Michiel Kruijff reply to the NPOV : the cited article in peer-reviewed Journal of Spacecraft & Rockets details the evidence that the scientific objectives were achieved, incl. a two-stage deployment demonstration, deployment reconstruction, capsule re-entry, tether properties determination, simulator validation and deployer performance validation. See also: http://repository.tudelft.nl/view/ir/uuid%3A9d437e58-82c0-4af1-935f-69ba5573c7a2/

I would thus suggest to remove the NPOV — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.169.141.54 (talk) 10:22, 9 January 2012 (UTC)