Talk:Young Kim/Archive 1

Violation of WP:WEIGHT?
It is unusual for an ethnic group to have strong reservations about one of its own members. For reference I just looked at the Tim Scott article. He was heavily rejected by black constituents but supported and elected by white majorities. The cited article was very clear about this division. It didn't say anyone was "evil," just that there was concern in the Korean community that the Republican party is hostile to immigrants but Kim chose to run as a Republican. The cited source was an Oriental newspaper. "We" don't have to change any articles. You don't have to change this one. Activist (talk) 15:08, 17 November 2018 (UTC)


 * You are giving undue WP:WEIGHT to a minority view. Fred Smoller, a political science professor at Chapman University in Southern California, says that the Orange County Asian community tends to vote "very strongly Republican on the issue on immigration"


 * Are you planning on following the advice given in WP:BRD ("Discuss the contribution, and the reasons for the contribution, on the article's talk page with the person who reverted your contribution. Don't restore your changes...") and WP:STATUSQUO ("During a dispute discussion, until a consensus is established, you should not revert away from the status quo")? --Guy Macon (talk) 15:37, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Sports metaphors highly inappropriate!
For Pete's sake, let's stop going overboard on the sports metaphors in writing about electoral politics! A little is cheesy, more is in poor taste, a lot is offensive. Wegesrand (talk) 17:15, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Reverted IP editor's deletion
I reverted well-sourced and pertinent info about the officeholder. Activist (talk) 05:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Upon reading further in the article, I recognized that she had changed her posiiton within a year, and further modified the text. Activist (talk) 07:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)