Talk:Zhengma method

Explanation of the method missing
The Chinese version of the page appears to be much more exhaustive, and the original page at Microsoft has been pulled, anyway. As a Westerner, I generally think that shape based input methods, as opposed to sound based input methods, are quite important for us in order to be able to write characters that we cannot read (Chinese have this problem to a lesser extent). Also, all methods that cover both traditional and simplified Chinese are highly relevant, as many people use the traditional characters, and I presently cannot judge which method provides the best coverage the most characters (eg, CangJie seems to have an artificial (?) "limit" of around 13.500 characters). If someone could translate the Chinese page, that would be great, but one would also need a place to do it piecemeal-wise (eg. it would take me several hours, if I could do it at all). 80.135.176.254 (talk) 00:38, 19 May 2013 (UTC)