Tarski's axiomatization of the reals

In 1936, Alfred Tarski gave an axiomatization of the real numbers and their arithmetic, consisting of only the eight axioms shown below and a mere four primitive notions: the set of reals denoted R, a binary relation over R, denoted by infix <, a binary operation of addition over R, denoted by infix +, and the constant 1.

Tarski's axiomatization, which is a second-order theory, can be seen as a version of the more usual definition of real numbers as the unique Dedekind-complete ordered field; it is however made much more concise by avoiding multiplication altogether and using unorthodox variants of standard algebraic axioms and other subtle tricks. Tarski did not supply a proof that his axioms are sufficient or a definition for the multiplication of real numbers in his system.

Tarski also studied the first-order theory of the structure (R, +, ·, <), leading to a set of axioms for this theory and to the concept of real closed fields.

Axioms of order (primitives: R, <)

 * Axiom 1 :If x < y, then not y < x.
 * [That is, "<" is an asymmetric relation. This implies that "<" is irreflexive, i.e., for all x, not x < x.]


 * Axiom 2 :If x < z, there exists a y such that x < y and y < z.
 * Axiom 3 :For all subsets X, Y ⊆ R, if for all x ∈ X and y ∈ Y, x < y, then there exists a z such that for all x ∈ X and y ∈ Y, if x ≠ z and y ≠ z, then x &lt; z and z &lt; y.
 * [In other words, "<" is Dedekind-complete, or informally: "If a set of reals X precedes another set of reals Y, then there exists at least one real number z separating the two sets."
 * This is a second-order axiom as it refers to sets and not just elements.]

Axioms of addition (primitives: R, <, +)

 * Axiom 4 :x + (y + z) = (x + z) + y.
 * [Note that this is an unorthodox mixture of associativity and commutativity.]


 * Axiom 5 :For all x, y, there exists a z such that x + z = y.
 * [This allows subtraction and also gives a 0.]


 * Axiom 6 :If x + y < z + w, then x < z or y < w.
 * [This is the contrapositive of a standard axiom for ordered groups.]

Axioms for 1 (primitives: R, <, +, 1)

 * Axiom 7 :1 ∈ R.
 * Axiom 8 :1 < 1 + 1.

Discussion
Tarski stated, without proof, that these axioms turn the relation < into a total ordering. The missing component was supplied in 2008 by Stefanie Ucsnay.

The axioms then imply that R is a linearly ordered abelian group under addition with distinguished positive element 1, and that this group is Dedekind-complete, divisible, and Archimedean.

Tarski never proved that these axioms and primitives imply the existence of a binary operation called multiplication that has the expected properties, so that R becomes a complete ordered field under addition and multiplication. It is possible to define this multiplication operation by considering certain order-preserving homomorphisms of the ordered group (R,+,<).