Template talk:AMC Shows

Complexity
"Reverting edits that make template difficult to read, should be organised in that manner only when shows are no longer current. see Template:USANetwork Shows and Template:Starz Shows": Since the same person edited the Starz template in the same overly complex style, I'm tempted to strip that back too. The USA network page is bloated, but it has many more programs. There is no need to follow that style here. For one thing, there is only one section "Original programming", why not just put that in the heading since it applies to all the shows? And dividing shows randomly by decade and by status is inconsistent. Also keep in mind that a navbox should be slim as possible, every extra line bloats many pages. And just how are three lines of shows, divided by decades, "difficult to read"?Barsoomian (talk) 08:57, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Incorrect/nonexistent program title?
I see a show listed here, "Breaking Dead" that has no page, and I'm pretty sure there is no such program. Did someone mean "Talking Dead" when making this template? I think this might be the case since the latter title is a real and current program that I don't see listed in the template. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.106.248.158 (talk) 21:42, 30 August 2013 (UTC)