Template talk:Air Force Space Command

Active vs Inactive
Air Force Space Command has a bit of history behind it; being started in 1982, and not folding at the end of the Cold War, it has held its fair share of units. I propose editing the template to BOLD the designations of Active units, while still listing the defunct/deactivated units on the template. Any comments? TDRSS (talk) 17:11, 22 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Maybe using bold would be better. I just now put (inactive) after the 3 SCS and added 850 SCS.  Bold for active probably makes better use of the space. --Pmsyyz (talk) 23:33, 9 December 2009 (UTC)


 * There is a need to add some kind of a legend to explain this. I had it halfway reverted before I checked this talk page. &mdash; MrDolomite &bull; Talk 15:10, 5 April 2011 (UTC)