Template talk:Campaignbox First Libyan Civil War

Counter Offensive
With the current counter offensive in the east of the country I wonder if we should update the campaignbox accordingly. I mean

Ra's Lanuf 1 - Bin Jawad - Ra's Lanuf 2 (- Brega 2)

--Wikieditoroftoday (talk) 20:48, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

I think there is no need for a second Ra's Lanuf battle article since in the first the rebels took the city on March 4 and secured it on March 5, however the second battle started with the constant bombing of the city on March 6, just a one-day difference. I already just broke up the synopsis of that battle into two phases, first - rebel victory, second - government counteroffensive and victory. However, I agree that, if government troops attack Brega, a second Brega battle article should be created since it has been 8 days since the last battle.EkoGraf (talk) 23:29, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

East Libyan Desert Campaign seems over
Shouldn't we remove the italics from East Libyan Desert Campaign? It seems like that campaign has ended with a rebel victory.74.131.99.14 (talk) 20:25, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Pre / Post 19 March division
I don't really understand the pre / post 19 match division, it makes the box more confusing and makes it look bloated, the other chronological way was far easier to use and read. - 89.100.227.84 (talk) 01:46, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

'1st Tripoli' and '2nd Tripoli'
Should '1st Tripoli' be changed to 'Tripoli clashes' and '2nd Tripoli' to 'Tripoli'? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.22.8.106 (talk) 06:59, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Inclusion of all three timeline articles links?
Does anyone think this is a good idea? I.e. linking to both main timeline article and the three (in the future possibly four) separate "calendar articles" in infobox? Me think so.

--Paracel63 (talk) 12:30, 27 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Now it's done. Short article abbreviations make for small space on one line.--Paracel63 (talk) 14:20, 1 October 2011 (UTC)