Template talk:Christian culture

The formatting is wrong
The formatting messes with built-in Wikipedia formatting. When a template is added to an article on a subject, that subject is marked in bold, but the way this template is formatted, that isn't possible. Also, MOS:HEADING is broken where headings are linked. There are probably other problems, but I'll just stop there and wait for others to comment. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:47, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Painful
Aughhh! My eyes! Editor2020, Talk 02:51, 10 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the note. True the colors need to be less harshness and background color easier on the eyes. I will try to change the background color.--Jobas (talk) 03:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't know that it will help. There are a lot of problems here. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:46, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you for you'r concern but the Template look was changed. The user:Tahc helping in improving the Template and the new one it's much better.--Jobas (talk) 10:29, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Not enough. For instance, Christian Music is now piped to just "Music" and it's a heading so it's not at all clear that it's in the template.
 * The fact that this template was created and applied without discussion is a similarly large problem. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:35, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Rather Music is piped to Christian Music. I think headings here for Art, Music, etc. are better than headings that say Christian Art, Christian Music, etc.
 * Pages, even templates, are normally created without discussion and then discussed afterward on said talk pages. I am not sure just what you would do/discuss differently. tahc chat 18:23, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * And so, because it's piped and a heading, it's not obvious that it's in the template. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:58, 11 February 2015 (UTC)