Template talk:Collective intelligence

This template has so many issues.
 * 1. The title probably isn't the most appropriate label for this collection of articles.
 * 2. Several of the articles could easily be merged.
 * 3. The template itself is likely original research.
 * 4. As per issue 3, what the template should or should not contain is highly subjective and overly reliant on participating editors to arrive at a unique and original consensus thereof.
 * 5. The template isn't being used by more than the one article that happens to have the same name, making it a fancy "see also" template for the top of that one article.

What do you think?


 * I think the template should be deleted or renamed (Collective intelligence has the most robust article and weightiest meaning, top down it's more relevant), and atleast a couple of the articles should be merged (but that's a side issue tangentially related to this template). 70.15.11.211 (talk) 15:10, 24 December 2012 (UTC)