Template talk:Human name disambiguation cleanup

Removal of ambox
I believe that this template should be reformatted in line with, but am looking for consensus before I make such a large change.

My reasoning:
 * 1) It would standardise the formatting for specialist disambig cleanup templates (should any more come about in future);
 * 2) 'ambox' refers to articles, which disambiguation pages are stated not to be (even in the manual of style);
 * 3) Putting a hatbox at the bottom of a page is just silly.

— Sasuke Sarutobi (talk) 23:02, 6 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I agree. So I did a major cleanup of hndis-cleanup. I moved the cleanup text and cleanup broom image into the disambig box, just like in disambig-cleanup. Gave it the new better "whatlinkshere" link that only lists articles. Made so it only categorises when in main (article) space. Made so it correctly handles the "name=" parameter, that is when "name=" is empty but defined it instead sorts on the actual page name. And removed Category:All disambiguation pages since that one is now inserted by dmbox, which all these disambig boxes uses. And extended the documentation.
 * And I applied some of these fixes to hndis too.
 * --David Göthberg (talk) 06:04, 13 February 2009 (UTC)