Template talk:Mobile Grain

Kenaston
Kenaston shows twice in the diagrams. One of them must be wrong… Tuvalkin (talk) 10:46, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Fxed thx! CapnZapp (talk) 14:50, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Suggested alternate diagram topology
Advantages: less wide (only 2 icon columns) and station label staggering is minimized. Opinions? Tuvalkin (talk) 10:46, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok by me CapnZapp (talk) 14:54, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Saskatoon
Depending on the local topology, Saskatoon can be represented as instead of. Tuvalkin (talk) 11:47, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I prefer the alternative Saskatoon representation; by the map its more of a thru line (except it only skirts southern edge of the city). CapnZapp (talk) 14:54, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I see what you mean — but both lines do fork here, still a long way from the station. Tuvalkin (talk) 21:24, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Not sure we're talking on the same page here. Since I don't know your google maps voodoo :-) let me show you how I'm envisioning it. Caution: mad paint skillz! http://i257.photobucket.com/albums/hh205/kazapp/saskatoo.png Note the similarity to if rotated 90 degrees clockwise. But I might have mistraced the rail lines in question... CapnZapp (talk) 11:03, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I get it. Makes perfect sense, then, as this is not a detailed diagram showing every detail of the network. Tuvalkin (talk) 20:36, 8 November 2013 (UTC)