Template talk:Moby-Dick

The Bedford Incident
Why was The Bedford Incident completely removed?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:55, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Editing the Template
The Template has been edited in order to: Further editing will be necessary in case of endorsement of the deletion proposal for the underdeveloped Ishmael-page.MackyBeth (talk) 19:29, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Remove the Pequod from the Characters section. A new section "Ships" was created which may develop into a section containing pages on other ships as well.
 * Bring together all the pages on the book itself, so the link to the Cetology page has been moved to the upper ranks of the template.~

Characters?
makes a good point that there should not be two links on the same line, but having "Characters" linked, we get into WP:EASTEREGG, that is, that a reader would not know what it links to without going there. Removing this link and adding "Other characters" meets both my concern and Tony's. ch (talk) 17:18, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
 * How is it an easter egg to have a list of characters under the character piped link. This is standard format for a template like this.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:55, 14 October 2014 (UTC)