Template talk:Pathology

Opinions about splitting some content?
Hi all, what would the opinions be about branching some of the content off this template? I think this section should be moved to a separate template:
 * Cellular adaptation:
 * Atrophy
 * Hypertrophy
 * Hyperplasia
 * Dysplasia
 * Metaplasia
 * Squamous
 * Glandular

The reason is that it stands out like a sore thumb amongst the rest of this template, which is much more general in form, describing pathology and subspecialities. The content above really relates to either  General histopathology findings  or  Cellular pathophysiology . I'm sure there are better titles to both but I hope I convey my point - these relate to the responses of cells to stress or injury and are better placed in a separate template. That template can also include some additional helpful links like fibrosis etc. So, to summarise my two questions are: Ping to who may have an opinion here. --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:27, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Cell death:
 * Necrosis
 * Coagulative necrosis
 * Liquefactive necrosis
 * Gangrenous necrosis
 * Caseous necrosis
 * Fat necrosis
 * Fibrinoid necrosis
 * Myocytolysis
 * Programmed cell death
 * Apoptosis
 * Pyknosis
 * Karyorrhexis
 * Karyolysis
 * 1) Should this content be split into a more appropriate template
 * 2) If so, what would be the best name for that template? (Ideally a name accessible to as many readers as possible) --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:27, 25 October 2020 (UTC)