Template talk:Rocky Mountain National Park

Format
, why you changed the color format? I mean is there a guideline about using green or this specific color combo for these?

I have a very hard time reading this green format - sensory issues - it's overwhelming to me and hard to read the words, like at the top. I tried to use like this ****drab green**** - and that was better to get into forestry kinds of colors. That could be an option in a deeper value. I'll look.-- CaroleHenson (talk) 15:16, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


 * I updated the color - and changed the background color for the title line - now that article is visible. See what you think of this. If the issue is getting them all in synch, I'm happy to make changes to the others based on what we come up with.-- CaroleHenson (talk) 15:37, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


 * I changed the colors to match Yosemite National Park and Kings Canyon National Park, not because I thought it was great design. In fact, the color on the title line clashes with other navboxes at Rocky Mountain National Park. Notice how all of the other navbox title backgrounds are park green?


 * In fact, I think we should change all of these templates to look more like Protected areas of Colorado, which seems much more like a standard navbox (just green, not blue). I will make the edits, but am open to other schemes. —hike395 (talk) 14:19, 1 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Ok, that's fine. That looks good.-- CaroleHenson (talk) 15:53, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Red links
No question - just saving the edit to the red links to the NRHP articles, in the Template:NRHP in Rocky Mountain NP — here.-- CaroleHenson (talk) 15:23, 31 October 2016 (UTC)