Template talk:Soviet and Russian ships after 1945

Burevestnik/Krivak name correction
I believe that the link should appear as Burevestnik (Krivak) as many people only know this class by its NATO nickname. Certainly 'Krivak' should appear somewhere alongside the actual name. However, I have been unable to get this to work, can anyone help? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kimdino (talk • contribs) 15:29, 27 December 2009 (UTC)


 * agreed, is krivak , like kresta kynda kanin etc

Add ships
somebody do help also, can be always i adding things ,also happen douches deleting my content my help add articles about Lavina and Priboj, Lider ,other projects , saw many on rus sources , and i wasted time also for images , most was deleted about articles i contributed --Zafer14ur8 (talk) 13:04, 18 October 2015 (UTC) rub&sap

Rename/move tamplate
Suggestion to rename template to cover soviet and Russian warships Hammer5000 (talk) 16:00, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Well the rename would have to be more comprehensive than that if you wanted to add Russian ships, as the end of the Cold War coincided roughly with the downfall of the Soviet Union. Llammakey (talk) 22:26, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * That would be correct and OK, but in this template there are ships that never been built in Soviet or Cold War time, they were built only recently in post Soviet time. This is why I raised the question. Another suggestion would be to create a different template that would capture both Soviet and Russian ships like a similar Template:Soviet and Russian submarines after 1945, and then edit this template to fit the scope of the title, meaning removing post soviet ships. Hammer5000 (talk) 13:40, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry, misunderstood what you meant there. I agree, modern Russian designs should not be in this template as currently titled. I also agree that the template should be renamed to something along the lines of the Soviet and Russian submarine one. Having two separate templates for two different eras with a lot of overlap would just create a template stack at the bottom of a lot of ship articles. Llammakey (talk) 14:12, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your response! So at the moment as i see the best practice here would be to rename/move the template to 'Template:Soviet and Russian ships after 1945'. To support this even the title of the template in the navbox is already 'Soviet Navy and Russian Navy ship classes after World War II' Hammer5000 (talk) 15:32, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Yep, in agreement. Llammakey (talk) 16:36, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

How to edit?
How do you edit this Template? Just getting a redirect text when trying to open the edit new classes. Walle83 (talk) 23:58, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Fixed the issue, basically the template's raw name hadn't been modified to it's actual title, so you should be able to edit it properly now.— Nohomers48 (talk • contribs) 06:03, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks Walle83 (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Add "naval" to template header
I propose that we change the template header to "Soviet and Russian naval ship classes after 1945"; these are obviously non-civilian ships. Tupsumato (talk) 23:05, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I second this idea here, for clarification purposes in the title.— Nohomers48 (talk • contribs) 02:58, 21 January 2019 (UTC)