Template talk:TSGN and SE Stations

Thameslink core
Given the key status (and importance) of Thameslink core stations - is it worth separating them out in this table? (St Pancras International - Farringdon - City Thameslink - Blackfriars - London Bridge(?) ) Turini2 (talk) 16:15, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Requested move 19 June 2024
Template:TSGN and SE Stations → Template:Railway stations served by Govia Thameslink Railway – While a move is required to remove the unnecessary caps in "Stations", the move will also make the naming convention of this template consistent with other TOC station templates, as indicated by the consensus reached at the RM at Template talk:Railway stations served by c2c. The suggested title stems from the fact that Thameslink, Southern, and Great Northern are all a part of Govia Thameslink. At the same time, I'd like to request the Southeastern content be split into a new template called Template:Railway stations served by Southeastern for the same reasons. Jalen Folf  (Bark[s])  23:54, 19 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Bensci54 (talk) 16:57, 1 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Comment are Southeastern and TSGN largely interconnected with each other? The template seems to have been formatted, so only specific services need to be shown when needed, so don't see the harm having it as one from a functional perspective. Swanley railway station for example uses both operators so uses both parts of the template. If that is a rarer case, there could be a possibility of a split, but note such a split would have to carry over all the formatting ideally. So the template isn't just two operators put together but more interconnected. May be a split should be raised separately.  Dank Jae  02:19, 20 June 2024 (UTC)


 * This should really not be a requested move but a split request. Difficultly north (talk) Time, department skies 20:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I should probably add I support the split in principle. Difficultly north (talk) Time, department skies 21:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)