Template talk:The Smile Sessions

Template change
I feel that encompassing the Smile template under The Smile Sessions is less than ideal. Does anyone else think a template such as the one I've mocked up below would be more fitting for Smile articles than the existing template?

Regards, Jamekae (talk) 04:41, 11 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Yeah, that makes a lot more sense. Not sure why you removed most of the related articles though.--Ilovetopaint (talk) 16:36, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
 * do whatever, but don't link to template:smile please, that is another template. I fixed it in your example, and in the main template. Frietjes (talk) 16:48, 11 August 2013 (UTC)