Template talk:Top Model

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconTelevision: Top Model Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. For how to use this banner template, see its documentation.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
This template is supported by the Top Model task force.

Afghanistan & Taiwan[edit]

  • Isn't Afghanistan a Top Model franchise?
  • Taiwan has an own show and it was mentioned in the International Version now. But why not now? Es.ntp.
Added in the ones that weren't listed. Even though they have their own Wiki page, they should still be listed. As for Taiwan, I don't think so. I've heard of a few peculiar Taiwanese modeling shows that were similar but weren't part of the franchise. If you can find proof of a Taiwanese Top Model, please add it in! Sireafi (talk) 04:25, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Segregation[edit]

Someone care to explain the need to separate current national and multinational franchises from the former? The previous lay-out that separates all franchises listed right now into national and multinational franchises alone would be a lot better. The footnote on italics is on point. It wasn't broken, and such fix is useless. There is too much information to digest.

To Anonymous, I am reverting back this template to its former lay-out with all the information from your changes, trusting you have checked them for veracity. If you think I made a mistake or you feel strongly against my move, feel free to reply so we can collaborate.

@Linguist111, Trafalk09, Robsinden, and DDKay: What do you think about my move and the move before mine? :) k_cms (talk) 12:40, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replied at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Top Model. Linguisttalk|contribs 14:29, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]