Template talk:Viljandimaa

Other 3 towns
They are not worth mentioning? I think they are. Pelmeen10 (talk) 14:15, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * If they shuold be mentioned in the "Municipalities of Viljandi County" template then I think maybe in the brackets after the municipality they're part of. How about alevid? Are these also worth mentioning in the county template? Flying Saucer (talk) 14:40, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Which country template? I don´t know, maybe you know better. It is template:Viljandimaa, so they should contain towns also. Pelmeen10 (talk) 16:15, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I meant the other county templates besides Viljandimaa (like Raplamaa, Pärnumaa), they all should have the same format shouldn't they? Flying Saucer (talk) 17:01, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Of course all similar templates should be in the same format. I don´t understand why template:Viljandimaa contains only municipalities. In my opinion county templates should at least contain towns (also?). This problem (name and content are different) occurs with lots of Estonian templates. - Pelmeen10 (talk) 21:46, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I get the point, I also think by including all towns it woult give a better overview of the county. So the problem is n the title? Let's change it, perhaps to "Viljandi County" only. Any ideas about the format inside the template? Flying Saucer (talk) 08:02, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, you should change all names of Estonian county templates (Or is there somebody who does not agree? Or is there better name/inside to these templates?). But I´m quite new here, so I don´t know about the inside, maybe look at other world on European country templates. Anyway, if you want to say something directly to me. - Pelmeen10 (talk) 13:54, 19 April 2010 (UTC)