Template talk:Winnie-the-Pooh

Removal of books
Should When We Were Very Young and Now We Are Six be removed from the template? Technically, these are not actual Winnie-the-Pooh novels; When We Were Very Young features the first of appearance of the character, and Now We Are Six features illistrations of the character. Thoughts? -- Cartoon Boy (talk) 9:56, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, none of these books are novels in any normal use of the term. --Pfold (talk) 21:28, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Characters listed
I don't think the alphabetical listing of characters in the template is the best way to organize them. Pooh himself should be first, no? And the others should be listed in rough order of importance after him, something like:  Winnie-the-Pooh, Piglet, Tigger, Christopher Robin, Rabbit, Eeyore, Kanga, Roo, Gopher, Lottie, Heffalump, Woozle, Lumpy, Kessie.Simplebutpowerful 16:54, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Pooh's Party Games
Why is there no article for this video game? 2604:2000:7FC0:1:E8D7:5FA9:D5A4:AD1 (talk) 00:48, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Xi Jinping in related people section
how can you argue that hes not associated with Winnie-the-Pooh when the section Xi Jinping exists? Horse Eye Jack (talk) 20:18, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Please do not open the same discussion in multiple places. You already started the discussion at Xi Jinping so this one is redundant and confusing.  Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 20:31, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
 * A good way to tell is ask the question "Would this template be placed on the linked article?" and, in this case, it wouldn't. If an article is added to 'Related' on a template it should also be placed on the linked page. Interesting though, I haven't seen this meme before. Randy Kryn (talk) 20:32, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Its gone beyond being a meme to the point where the BBC will write a few hundred words on Mike Pompeo posting a picture of his dog with their Winnie-the-Pooh chew toy ... Thats not a casual or unnoteworthy association. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 20:35, 12 August 2020 (UTC)