User:Beyond My Ken/code


 * Cite book
 * name-list-style=


 * Add archive banner/box


 * Auto-archiving


 * Template state control
 * state =


 * collapse_state =


 * Multiple images


 * Columns

or


 * Uploading posters


 * Navbox shell


 * Sucession box shell


 * Photos in cast sections


 * Copied

, can you please explain why you reverted [xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx this edit] of mine. What about it did you find objectionable? Thank you. ~
 * Talk page request


 * Film infobox


 * Actor infobox

Mary had a little lamb. Its fleece was white as snow.
 * Nesting footnotes

====Notes====

====References====


 * Fake headers


 * Quotebox

goto folder, shift-right click on empty space, open powershell
 * YouTube downloads

video: youtube-dl  -f bestvideo[ext=mp4]+bestaudio[ext=m4a]

audio: youtube-dl  -x --audio-format mp3


 * Adding unsourced information

Please do not add unsourced information to Wikipedia articles, as you did to this article. Information added to Wikipedia must satisfy WP:V and be verifiable through the addition of citations to reliable sources. Information which is unsourced is subject to removal at any time, and must not be restored without proper sourcing. ~


 * Brescia LTA

Long-term abuser
This IP is most probably the Brescia LTA. ~


 * Neutral pointers
 *  Neutral pointers to this discussion have been placed on the talk pages of the WikiProjects listed above. Notification of individual editors is to be avoided per WP:CANVASSING. ~ 

Done
 * Check mark


 * Paid contributor tag

Paid contributions tag
A paid editor made contributions to this article, and has disclosed that fact on this page, therefore the paid contributions template is a matter of fact and does not require discussion. ~

| designated_other2_name = NYC Landmark
 * NYC landmark
 * designated_other2_pos = bottom
 * designated_other2_date = XXXX
 * designated_other2_abbr = NYCL
 * designated_other2_link = New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission
 * designated_other2_color = #FFE978

Hi. I have reverted an edit of yours on this article, and would like to remind you about WP:BRD. When your Bold edit has been Reverted by another editor, the recommended next step, if you continue to think the edit is necessary, is to Discuss the dispute on the article talk page with other editors, but not to re-revert it, which is the first step to edit warring, a disruptive activity which is not allowed. Discussion on the talk page is the only way we have of reaching consensus, which is central to resolving editing disputes in an amicable and collegial manner, which is why communicating your concerns to your fellow editors is essential. While the discussion is going on, the article generally should remain in the status quo ante until the consensus as to what to do is reached (see WP:STATUSQUO).

Please remember that as the person attempting to make a change to the article, the WP:ONUS is on you to justify the change, and to get a consensus if it is disputed; and again, please do not edit war.

To help move things along, I have started a discussion on the article talk page about the disputed edit, which you will find [XXXXX here]. Please take the opportunity to make your views known there. It is best not to restore the material you added until there is a consensus among the editors there to do so. Thanks, ~


 * MOS

Hi. Thank you for your edit pointing out parts of the above article which you feel do not adhere to the WP:Manual of Style (MOS). I'm sure that you are aware that MOS is not a mandatory Wikipedia policy, it is instead a non-mandatory guideline to editing. At the top of every MOS page you will find the following information:

"This guideline is a part of the English Wikipedia's Manual of Style. It is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though it is best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply."

You have come across some of those common sense exceptions, which I'll be happy to explain to you on the article's talk page, where they can be discussed, and other editors can weigh in with their opinions about whether these particular exceptions are acceptable or not. Through that discussion, which is an essential part of the Wikipedia process, the editors can reach a consensus about what should be done. Please take the opportunity of going to the talk page and taking part in that discussion. Thanks, ~


 * Request move


 * Swapping two pages, preserving history (round-robin)


 * Move page TARGET (CURRENT REDIRECT) to the title TEMP (previously non-existing)
 * NO REDIRECT


 * Move page CURRENT to the title TARGET (allowed because A is evacuated)
 * NO REDIRECT


 * Move page TEMP to the title CURRENT (allowed because B is evacuated)
 * REDIRECT IF USEFUL

This IP's edits are consistent with Long-term abuse/Broadway Hoaxer, therefore the warnings given are for persistent hoax/vandalism.
 * Warning to Broadway Hoaxer

Re:

~

~

This IP's edits are consistent with Long-term abuse/Voice Cast Vandal, therefore the warnings given are for persistent hoax/vandalism.
 * Warning to Voice Cast Vandal

Re:

~

~


 * Paid editing

Considering your history of contributions here...
...I need to ask you this direct question:

Are you paid for your editing on Wikipedia by the companies you write about, or any companies associated with them?

If so, you need to be aware of this:

The Wikimedia Foundation Terms of Use (which is our Terms of Use, since we've never adopted another one), says: '''Paid contributions without disclosure These Terms of Use prohibit engaging in deceptive activities, including misrepresentation of affiliation, impersonation, and fraud. As part of these obligations, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. You must make that disclosure in at least one of the following ways:


 * a statement on your user page,
 * a statement on the talk page accompanying any paid contributions, or
 * a statement in the edit summary accompanying any paid contributions.

'''Applicable law, or community and Foundation policies and guidelines, such as those addressing conflicts of interest, may further limit paid contributions or require more detailed disclosure.A Wikimedia Project community may adopt an alternative paid contribution disclosure policy. If a Project adopts an alternative disclosure policy, you may comply with that policy instead of the requirements in this section when contributing to that Project. An alternative paid contribution policy will only supersede these requirements if it is approved by the relevant Project community and listed in the alternative disclosure policy page.For more information, please read our FAQ on disclosure of paid contributions.We reserve the right to exercise our enforcement discretion with respect to the above terms.''' If you are a paid editor, you must comply with these terms, as well as with our English Wikipedia-specific policy on editing with a conflict of interest. This is not a matter for debate, it's part of the contract you agree to by editing here.

So, again, a direct answer please : do you get paid for editing here?

Hi. One of our cardinal principles here is that we should, whenever possible, "assume good faith" of other editors. In this spirit, I'm going to assume that you were unaware that the username you chose, "XXXXXXXXX", is sending up flares which announce "I am not here to improve the encyclopedia, I am probably a troll or a vandal." Given that, you might want to consider a different username.I'll be standing by if you need help, watching your edits to make sure that, as a "newbie", you don't have any problems. ~
 * Soft warning to possible trolls or vandals

==People who are blocked or banned from Wikipedia...== ...cannot edit here no matter what identity or IP they use. Your edits have all been reverted. ~
 * Blocked and banned

Regarding [(DIFF HERE) this], a reminder that you are indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia, in furtherance of a community-imposed site ban, and that, further, you are "topic banned from creating, editing, or attempting to delete articles about [your]self. Furthermore, [you are] banned from inserting [your] presence into other articles as well as banned from removing [your] presence from other articles. Any edit that appears to be WP:PROMOTIONAL about [your]self is to be considered a violation of this topic ban." ~
 * User:Daniel C. Boyer

==Hello== I just wanted to drop you a note to let you know that you are banned from posting comments on my talk page, unless, of course, you are  required to  by Wikipedia  policy . If you are required to post a notice on my talk page, please clearly indicate in the edit summary what policy you are doing so under. Any other posted comments will be deleted without being read.Please note that this ban also applies to pinging me.Also, if you email me to get around this ban, I will assume that you are agreeing in advance that the entire contents of the e-mail can be released to anyone I wish to.Thanks. ~
 * Bunting for a home run

→
 * Purge WP:RFAR


 * Addition of unsourced changes to numbers



– the armed paramilitary branch of the Nazi Party's Schutzstaffel (SS) –
 * Waffen-SS insert

In general, please do not contact me in regard to previous disputes, sanctions, blocks and bans involving other editors. I am attempting to keep my involvement with Wikipedia and Commons on the level of creating, editing and uploading content, and trying to stay out of meta-discussions of all kinds. I hope in this way to avoid disputes, and especially to avoid having my name brought up on ANI every couple of weeks, therefore making my Wikipedia experience more rewarding and less aggravating than it has been at times in the past. Thanks. ~
 * No meta-discussions

Other

 * |Between+My+Ken|Beyond+My+Ken&project=en.wikipedia Combo: All my edits (42,564 + 2,091 = 44,655 + current)
 * My photos used on WMF projects
 * VisualFileChange
 * Multiple Article Editors
 * Interaction Timeline
 * Editor Interaction Analyzer
 * Intertwined
 * Intersecting contributions
 * Multiple editors intersecting contributions
 * Wikistalk (R.I.P.)
 * en.Wiki checker (articles/users)
 * Contribution surveyor
 * User compare
 * Top namespace edits
 * WikiChecker (edit analysis)
 * Blocked users (edit URL to date needed)
 * WikiChecker (new)
 * User list
 * Edit summary search
 * Edit summary search ??
 * Edit summary abbreviations
 * LinkSearch
 * Find Link
 * TinEye image search
 * Check image usage
 * AfD stats
 * AfD, RfA counter
 * RfX counter
 * RfA graph
 * Commons Helper (move to Commons)
 * Commons Helper 2
 * User warnings
 * Speedy deletion criteria (CSD)
 * NYC Digital Archive
 * User scripts
 * Perennial sources

Edit counts
 * blank
 * Before My Ken
 * Between My Ken
 * Beyond My Ken

Wikipedia Library
 * Applications page


 * Article revision stats (X!)
 * Article blamer (X!)
 * Admin stats
 * Move watch
 * Move revert
 * Page view analysis
 * Page traffic stats
 * Page history (preferred)
 * Page history stats
 * Page watchers
 * Toolbox
 * Range contributions

Vandals, socks and disruptors
 * Broadway Hoaxer
 * Food for Thought
 * Kumioko
 * Roman Catholic Vandal
 * Voice Cast Vandal
 * Otto4711:
 * Current
 * Archive
 * "Daniel C. Boyer"
 * "Boyer, Daniel C."
 * Note: Edit filter is 917; if disabled, 1037


 * "Friedrich Neuman-Göring"
 * "Lutz Fehling"
 * "Grams, Grant W."
 * Storm598
 * JoelGallard92
 * Freemason LTA
 * User talk:Favonian for HarveyCarter

Subpages
 * Daffyduck1234
 * English Patriot Man
 * Brockhold / AJ DA YOUNGAN
 * Bad copyediting IPs
 * Brescia LTA
 * MaTF-created articles

Miscellaneous
 * US BLS CPI Inflation Calculator
 * Billing block
 * "An historical"
 * Neo-Nazi watchlist
 * BenjaminR44 page creations
 * Alexb102702 contribs
 * Chas. Caltrop contribs
 * RaGn edit count
 * FtA contribs
 * Anthony22 contribs
 * Lmatt contribs

Citation templates


 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 


 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 

Non-free images
 * 100,000 sq. pixels max. size, w/ 5% overrun

External image sources
 * NYPL Digital Gallery
 * NYPL Digital Collections
 * NYPL Flickr photostream - Berenice Abbott
 * LoC Digital Collections
 * LoC Digitized newspapers 1836-1922
 * Smithsonian Open Access
 * NYC Department of Records
 * Museum of City of New York Collection
 * Old NYC
 * Lantern (check for renewal, also IntArc)
 * UPenn copyrt books (27/28 year after pub.)
 * newspapers.com (sub)
 * newspaperarchive.com (sub)
 * Tineye image search
 * Google Reverse Image Search

Landmarks
 * NYCLPC Interactive Map
 * List of New York City Landmarks
 * NYC Landmarks Preservations Commission
 * Neighborhood Preservation Center
 * NRHP (gov)
 * NRHP (not gov)

Books
 * Architectural Guide to Brooklyn
 * Old Brooklyn Heights

Maps
 * NYC GIS map
 * NYC neighborhoods map (DCP)
 * New York Times Real Estate
 * NYPL Space/Time Directory
 * description
 * NYC Oasis Map

Translate
 * DeepL
 * Google Translate